A Class Act

Currently a communications consultant at Redbrick Communications, Lisa Timoshenko is the winner of this year’s Gary Schlee Scholarship. The Centennial College Corporate Communications & Public Relations graduate completed an internship with Redbrick this fall. Lisa has a Bachelors degree and a Masters degree from Wilfrid Laurier University.

The Gary Schlee Scholarship goes to a CCPR student demonstrating outstanding work in the program’s writing courses.

Salza Khakoo, who is wrapping up a communications internship at Women’s College Hospital, is this year’s winner of the Gary Schlee Scholarship. Salza’s passion for writing isn’t a new interest. In addition to nearly completing her Centennial certificate in Corporate Communications and Public Relations, she is a Journalism graduate of Ryerson University. Congratulations, Salza!

Previous scholarship winners are Jessica Wolfraim and April Tsui.

Congratulations to Jessica Wolfraim, winner of the second Gary Schlee Scholarship awarded to the top writer in Centennial College’s Corporate Communications & Public Relations program.

Jessica works for Morneau Sobeco, the human resources consultancy where she did her internship. Two other program graduates — Andrea Nasello and Jacqui Fabro — are also communications consultants at Morneau Sobeco.

The first scholarship winner, in 2008, was April Tsui who was working for the Regional Municipality of Durham after graduation.

Officially, no. But since its author retired as a professor of corporate communications and public relations, the postings have moved from intermittent to non-existent. Don’t get me wrong; if I have something to say about PR education in Canada, I’ll drop by and update this site.

In the meantime, I haven’t stopped blogging. I have have launched a blog with daily postings called Canadian Prime Ministers: Date Book, and have a second one that reproduces columns I’ve written about the history of the Bedford Park community in Toronto.

If an internship is part of the PR curriculum, it becomes a primary preoccupation for students, whether the program is six months or six years. And that’s the nub of one of the challenges posed by work placements. Students feel a great deal is riding on landing exactly the right internship. This becomes so important that the process of finding a rewarding placement is often compromised.

Please understand that I’m generalizing here, but the observations are based on nearly three decades of placing students in communication departments and agencies.

It’s gratifying to hear graduates come in and tell students not to obsess about finding the perfect internship. But the message usually falls on deaf ears. Instead, the student agonizes over bagging a holy-grail placement. The student isn’t sure what that is, but he or she knows what it isn’t. It isn’t that internship promising plenty of relevant work, a veteran mentor or uplifting working conditions. Sure, those sound fine, but there may be an even better placement out there. So, the student hangs tough, holding out for an internship that probably won’t materialize because it probably doesn’t even exist. This pickiness — a phenomenon that seems to be increasing — often means the student starts the internship later, usually in an organization not as fullfilling as some of those previously snubbed.

Perhaps this fussiness is some of the fallout from Generation Y (see 10 Characteristics of Generation Me) where a sense of entitlement clashes with the concept of ‘paying your dues’ or ‘working your way up’. Whatever the cause, it seems to result in students working much harder to find a less rewarding experience. And it certainly adds to the burden of internship directors trying to match new practitioners to organizations.

The other challenge is raised by organizations offering no remuneration to interns. In today’s workplace, the idea of offering no money to someone bringing value to the organization is, quite simply, inexcusable. Why does it happen? In some cases (many entertainment and sports organizations, for example), it’s a sense that if the student isn’t prepared to work for nothing, they can probably find someone else who will. They milk it because they can.

In other cases, they just don’t have the money to offer. (In many of these situations, it’s interesting to note that although they want an intern again the following year, they still haven’t budgeted for it — nor the year after that.)

Truly successful internships are helped along by students who approach them with realistic expectations, and organziations prepared to reward the work being done.

A year ago the Talk Is Cheap ‘unconference’ attracted about 160 PR practitioners and students. It was meant to encourage communicators to find out more about the growth and potential of social media. During and after the event I was often asked: “So, when is the next one?”

I hedged. Did the Web 2.0 space need another annual event? Knowing I was retiring from teaching, did I want to tackle a second one? Well, Christine Smith and Barry Waite, who both teach at Centennial, wanted to see the ‘unconference’ continue. So, Talk Is Cheap 2.0 is taking place on Tuesday Wednesday, November 12, at Centennial’s Centre for Creative Communications. Social Media tactics have grown remarkably in the past 12 months, but there’s still lots to know and talk about as we try to get a handle on how to use it effectively.

Check out the details at http://talkischeap.pbwiki.com, then, if you’re in the Toronto area, sign up to attend.

See you there!

In a recent post, Ann Subervi of The Ethical Optimist blog notes that PR Programs Get Failing Grade. Her concern is based on a lack of ’smarts’ she sees in recent PR grads when it comes to some of the basic media relations skills required by her agency.

As tempting as it is to wonder why the agency’s clients are only interested in “Did you get my message out there?” instead of the results of getting out the message, or why agencies tend to lean so heavily on the trying to ’sell’ story ideas, I was more interested in the challenge her concerns pose to PR educators.

The problem is this: how do we adequately prepare PR students for a field that blankets so many working sectors and embraces so many different communication activities? Ann is looking for grads who can talk (or pitch or telemarket) to the media. Other practitioners are looking for grads who can put together a realistic communication proposal or plan, or write compelling copy, or work effectively with printers, or plan and carry out events, or reseach effectively, or … (add your particular need here).

The danger in trying to capture every ‘must-have’ and many ‘nice-to-haves’ in curriculum is ending up with a diluted program that means graduates know a little bit about a lot, and not much in depth about anything.

Many practitioners profess a desire to interview grads who see the big picture and have a sound knowledge of communications planning. In practise, many of them avoid these grads in favour of communicators who can effortlessly ‘do’ what’s needed at the entry level: write the release, churn out the media list, do the media monitoring, publish the newsletter.

So, can PR programs be all things to all people? No, they can’t. Even college programs that concentrate on the applied skills that Ann seeks can’t easily cover it all. I don’t know of any programs that do meaningful role-plays to pitch media. It’s not a bad idea, but an unlikely one if you have a class of 40 students.

The best solution to developing specific skills that match the student’s strengths and interests with the organization’s needs is the internship. It’s fertile ground to help the student get relevant, realistic day-to-day training. The investment of time by the organization comes with the potential payoff of acquiring an employee who fits the culture and has the ’smarts’.

In nearly three decades teaching writing courses and pouring over thousands of student stories, I’ve been subjected to plenty of grammatical and style missteps. Some of them reared their heads more often than others. Here’s a look at 10 prevalent violations:

1. Its vs. It’s. I doubt you’re particularly surprised by this one. It has plagued writers because common sense would love to nudge us to towards seeing the apostrophe as a possessive instead of its (not it’s!) role in a contraction. Okay, it’s (not its!) not logical. All the more reason to commit it to memory. It-apostrophe-s has only one meaning — a contraction for it is. Everything else is its.

2. Comma Splices. Sentence structure doesn’t appear to have the same palatability it once had. More and more students aren’t done once they’ve delivered their subject-verb-object content. Instead, they attach a comma to the hind end and launch into another discrete thought. And sometimes, they go at for a third or fourth time before the sentence(s) gets its period. Where is the phenomenon coming from? E-mail?

3. Overuse of ‘that’. I truly believe that the word ‘that’ is one that is used so much that it’s overwhelming. It would be nice to be able to develop a little Word macro that would flag each time that the word ‘that’ appears and ask: “Recite the sentence without the ‘that’. Does it have to be there? If yes, great. If no, kindly annihilate it.”

4. The ‘ize’ have it. Sure, in a business that loves to ’strategize’ and ‘prioritize’ everything, this is a tough one to avoid these days — some dictionaries have already caved in on the above examples. Still, it behooves effective corporate writers to take the trouble to see if the word actually exists. Then again, maybe I should just sanctionize the practice and move on.

5. Everyday vs. every day. This one is downright rampant and I blame advertising for it. Huge companies (McDonald’s and Loblaws supermarkets to name only two) are spending big dollars to install banners and run ads full of slogans that promise savings, quality, or freshness everyday (sic). Everyday is an adjective — that’s it. Otherwise, the copywriter should be choosing option two: ‘every day’. I’m waiting for organizations to start promising savings, quality or freshness everyweek or everymonth.

6. ‘Then’ instead of ‘than’. I keep hoping it’s a typo, but my confidence begins to sink when I’ve tripped over three or four of them in one story. That’s when I know it’s a bigger problem then I thought.

7. Verb creations. Whether we’re impacting shareholders or trashing parties, there’s something very leading edge about coining new verbs that are pedastalled (my word; I hope I’m the first to use it!) on nouns.

8. Cliches. Sorry I didn’t go the whole nine yards and include the accent over the ‘e’ on this puppy; it hurts me more than it hurts you. Sometimes I think cliches are hotter than a snake’s ass in a wagon rut — if they serve a purpose the writer can defend. Most times? Just a sign of lazy writing.

9. Use vs. Utilize. Past students can tell you this one was a particular Schlee bugbear. In most cases you don’t need to utilize ‘utilize’. Simply use ‘use’.

10. High school. If you’ve been raised on a diet of local sports coverage in your community paper, I’ll buy the excuse. This typo is almost the norm in collegiate sports reporting. Google the non-word ‘highschool’ and see what you get. The search engine behemoth simply ignores the yahoos who think the term is one word.

I’ll stop at 10, but I can’t resist adding two of my favourite malapropisms. On more than one occasion, students writing about compiling materials referred in stories to the ‘copulation of results’. Another student writing about the subject’s work in health care had me confused about the person’s work with ‘leopards’. It took me awhile to realize it was meant to be ‘lepers’.

A comment by recent Centennial grad Brandon Carlos to a post by Judy Gombita on PR Conversations about the launch of PR Week’s Canadian newsletter, rued the lack of a Canadian PR textbook and similar resources. The observation prompted a second posting from Judy who was on the hunt for materials about Canadian corporate communications and public relations.

The result has been a wonderful, if sometimes frustrating, conversation about PR education and research in this country (and others, like South Africa). Check it out at http://www.prconversations.com/?p=452. Fraser Likely’s bibiography alone makes it worthwhile to move your cursor back to the end of the previous sentence and press down.

One of the nice things about teaching folks who go on to make part of their living through their writing is seeing their bylines in unexpected places. So, it was a pleasant surprise last week to stumble across a graduate’s name attached to a story in the feisty entertainment tabloid, The Georgia Strait, in Vancouver where I’m on vacation. Bernice Chan has been living in Beijing for more than a year now and has had a front row seat to the city’s sometime rocky preparations for the Olympic Games set to start in about two weeks.

Her article in The Georgia Strait was billed as a travel piece and it’s a wonderful view of the irritants and joys she’s found since moving there. She indicates that when she arrived she was “intent on witnessing the changes in the city, and hoped to learn more about the place and its people.” What follows is a concise, anecdotal overview of some of her findings.

To get an even better sense of her cultural and Games prep experiences, simply go to the continuing story found on her blog: Beijing Calling. (You’ll note that Bernice is listed in my blogroll to the right.)

As Beijing becomes a focus of world attention in August, check out Bernice’s exposure to cuisine, security, transportation and entertainment in China’s capital city. It will be a refreshing alternative to the generic pieces served up by the sports networks during the actual Games.

The Beijing Summer Olympic Games haven’t yet begun, but a pavilion in China’s capital city promoting the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games in 2010 is already in place. Photo by Bernice Chan.